Dutch beach volleyball player Steven van de Velde, who previously served time in prison for the rape of a 12-year-old girl, faced even louder boos during his second match at the Paris Olympics. Despite the crowd’s hostile reaction, Van de Velde and his teammate, Matthew Immers, secured a victory.
Background and Initial Reaction
Previous Conviction
Steven van de Velde, 29, was convicted in 2016 for raping a 12-year-old girl in England and served 13 months in prison. Despite widespread calls from victims’ advocates, lawmakers, and fans for his ban from the Olympics, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) stated it had no authority to prevent the Netherlands from sending a qualified athlete.
Olympic Debut
The pair made their Olympic debut three days prior, receiving a mix of boos and cheers from the Dutch fans. However, the negative response intensified during their second match against Chile.
Second Match Reaction
Increased Hostility from the Crowd
In their second match, Van de Velde and Immers won with scores of 21-19 and 21-16. The crowd’s reaction was markedly more hostile, with Van de Velde being jeered almost every time he touched the ball.
Teammate’s Response
Matthew Immers expressed his disappointment with the crowd’s behavior, acknowledging that while he cannot change Van de Velde’s past, he is committed to playing alongside him. Immers emphasized their mental strength and determination to persevere through the adversity.
“I was disappointed with the crowd, for sure,” Immers said. “I cannot do anything about his past anymore. I’m here to play with him. … So, yeah, I’m disappointed with it. But I think mentally we’re really strong, and I’m really strong to get through this, together. And we’re going to do that.”
Controversy and IOC’s Stance
Calls for Ban
Despite the calls for Van de Velde’s exclusion from the Olympics, the IOC maintained its position, stating it could not intervene in the Netherlands’ decision to send a qualified athlete.
Ongoing Debate
The situation continues to stir debate among the public, with strong opinions on both sides regarding Van de Velde’s participation in the Olympics.
Conclusion
The case of Steven van de Velde at the Paris Olympics underscores the complex issues surrounding athletes with criminal backgrounds competing on the world stage. As the debate continues, the reactions from the crowd highlight the ongoing tension and controversy.